Solar System Size Comparison Calculator
Compare any 3 solar system sizes side-by-side — cost, production, payback, 25-year savings, and ROI with winner badges for each metric.
| Metric | System A 6 kW | System B 8 kW | System C 10 kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Cost (after ITC) | $12,600BEST | $16,800 | $21,000 |
| Annual Production | 9,417 kWh | 12,556 kWh | 15,695 kWhBEST |
| % Bill Offset | 73% | 98% | 122%BEST |
| Monthly Savings | $110/mo | $146/mo | $150/moBEST |
| Payback Period | 9.6 yrsBEST | 9.6 yrsBEST | 11.7 yrs |
| 25-Year Net Savings | $32,346 | $43,127 | $44,627BEST |
| ROI | 257%BEST | 257%BEST | 213% |
How to Use This Calculator
Enter your home's details
Enter your current monthly electric bill and select your location. These two inputs determine your annual energy consumption and how much each kW of solar will produce in your climate. The calculator uses these to compute the offset percentage for any system size.
Set three system sizes to compare
Enter any three system sizes in kW. Default values of 6/8/10 kW represent conservative, standard, and aggressive sizing for the average US home. You can enter fractional values like 7.5 kW. A useful approach: set System A to what your installer quoted, System B to one size larger, and System C to one size smaller — then compare the financial trade-offs.
Read the comparison table
The table shows 7 metrics side-by-side with the best value highlighted per metric. Note that "best" differs by metric — best payback means lowest years, best 25-yr savings means highest dollars. The winner badges at the bottom show which system wins each category.
Use the decision framework
The four decision cards show which system wins for maximum savings, minimum upfront cost, best ROI percentage, and fastest payback. These categories often favor different systems — the largest system usually has maximum savings but not the best ROI.
How to Choose the Right System Size
| Strategy | Target Offset | Best For | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 70–85% | Budget-conscious buyers, poor export NEM | Lower cost, leaves some bill remaining |
| Match bill exactly | 95–105% | Most homeowners, full retail NEM | Optimal balance of cost and savings |
| Aggressive | 110–130% | EV charger planned, electric heat, battery | Higher upfront, longer payback |
| Battery-ready | 80–90% + battery | Avoided-cost NEM (CA, TX), self-consumption | Combines battery ROI with right-sized solar |
| Minimum upfront | 50–70% | Tight budget, high electricity rates | Fastest payback despite smaller system |
How the Comparison Is Calculated
The 25-year model includes two compounding effects: panel degradation at 0.5% per year (reducing production) and electricity rate escalation at 3% per year (increasing savings value). These partially offset each other — production declines while the value of each kWh produced increases. The net effect typically adds 15–25% to simple payback-period savings estimates over the system life.